1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (467 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | XU 6 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 467 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |