1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (162 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Camaro | Carisma |
Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1410 mm |