1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1997 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1997 Mercury Villager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1997 Mercury Villager. (149 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercury Villager.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1997 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Camaro | Villager |
Year Released | 1989 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 149 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2860 mm |