1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1997 Suzuki X90
To start off, 1997 Suzuki X90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (134 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1997 Suzuki X90. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1997 Suzuki X90.
Because 1997 Suzuki X90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki X90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Suzuki X90. (132 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Suzuki X90.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1997 Suzuki X90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Camaro | X90 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2210 mm |