1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1998 Volvo S90
To start off, 1998 Volvo S90 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1998 Volvo S90. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1998 Volvo S90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Volvo S90. (260 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Volvo S90.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1998 Volvo S90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | S90 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1450 mm |