1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Suzuki X90
To start off, 1999 Suzuki X90 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 189 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki X90. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki X90.
Because 1999 Suzuki X90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki X90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki X90. (132 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki X90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Suzuki X90 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Camaro | X90 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 96 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 132 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2210 mm |
