1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2001 Honda Logo
To start off, 2001 Honda Logo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (134 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2001 Honda Logo. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2001 Honda Logo.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Logo. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2001 Honda Logo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | Logo |
Year Released | 1989 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |