1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Daewoo Kalos

To start off, 2002 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (103 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Kalos.

Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (150 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. 2002 Daewoo Kalos has automatic transmission and 1989 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Daewoo Kalos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Chevrolet Camaro 2002 Daewoo Kalos
Make Chevrolet Daewoo
Model Camaro Kalos
Year Released 1989 2002
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4295 cc 1599 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 285 HP 103 HP
Torque 376 Nm 150 Nm
Engine Bore Size 99 mm 79.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 81.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1240 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2490 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]