1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Lada 110
To start off, 2002 Lada 110 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 215 more horse power than 2002 Lada 110. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 110.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 110. (115 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Lada 110 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
| Model | Camaro | 110 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2500 mm |
