1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2002 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP) has 558 more horse power than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (285 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 614 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (376 Nm). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotec |
| Model | Camaro | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4295 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 843 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1150 mm |
