1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (208 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (407 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | S60 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 208 HP |
Torque | 223 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 93.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2720 mm |