1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2003 Renault Koleos is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 210 more horse power than 2003 Renault Koleos. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Koleos.
Because 2003 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Koleos. (105 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Koleos.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Koleos |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2740 mm |