1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Ford C-MAX

To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 181 more horse power than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford C-MAX.

Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (146 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Chevrolet Camaro 2004 Ford C-MAX
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Camaro C-MAX
Year Released 1989 2004
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4295 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 285 HP 104 HP
Torque 376 Nm 146 Nm
Engine Bore Size 99 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 81.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1240 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2650 mm