1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.

Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Chevrolet Camaro 2004 Nissan X-Trail
Make Chevrolet Nissan
Model Camaro X-Trail
Year Released 1989 2004
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5735 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 238 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 467 Nm 192 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 80.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.9:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2630 mm