1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,390 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP) has 166 more horse power than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Camaro | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 4390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 300 HP |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 90 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |
