1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2005 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (376 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Camaro | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2710 mm |