1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Fiat Croma

To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 167 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma.

Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (280 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Chevrolet Camaro 2006 Fiat Croma
Make Chevrolet Fiat
Model Camaro Croma
Year Released 1989 2006
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4295 cc 1909 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 285 HP 118 HP
Torque 376 Nm 280 Nm
Engine Bore Size 99 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93 mm 90.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.3:1 18.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1240 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2710 mm