1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 95 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
| Model | Camaro | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4295 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 98.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 86.7 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |
