1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (148 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | Clio |
Year Released | 1989 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2480 mm |