1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Camaro | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4295 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2619 mm |
