1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2010 Kia Forte. (173 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Forte.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Forte. (228 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Forte.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Camaro | Forte |
Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4295 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 173 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 228 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4481 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2649 mm |