1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Mazda 5

To start off, 2011 Mazda 5 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 5. (157 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 5.

Because 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 5. (221 Nm). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

1989 Chevrolet Camaro 2011 Mazda 5
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro 5
Year Released 1989 2011
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4295 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 285 HP 157 HP
Torque 376 Nm 221 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4585 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1240 mm 1615 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2751 mm