1989 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (238 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC90. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC90.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo XC90. (420 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Camaro | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 467 Nm | 420 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1897 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |
