1989 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Celebrity | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
Model | Celebrity | CTS |
Year Released | 1989 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 3563 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |