1989 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Celebrity | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 4014 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 100.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 74 L |
