1989 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Celebrity | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 68 L |
