1989 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Celebrity | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |
