1989 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Celebrity | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Celebrity | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 61 L |
