1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 141 kg more than 2009 Volvo S40.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Monte Carlo | S40 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1339 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |
