1989 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1480 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 1989 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chevrolet Suburban (407 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1989 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chevrolet Suburban | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Suburban | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1989 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2300 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1867 mm |