1989 Chrysler Conquest vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Conquest would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler Conquest. (186 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler Conquest.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler Conquest (318 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1989 Chrysler Conquest will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Conquest | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Conquest | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 186 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2340 mm |