1989 Chrysler Conquest vs. 2010 Ford F-450
To start off, 2010 Ford F-450 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Conquest would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler Conquest. (186 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler Conquest.
Because 2010 Ford F-450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford F-450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Conquest, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 496 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler Conquest. (318 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler Conquest | 2010 Ford F-450 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Conquest | F-450 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 186 HP | 326 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 318 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 6670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 4390 mm |
