1989 Chrysler ES vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1989 Chrysler ES is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler ES weights approximately 235 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler ES (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1989 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler ES | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | ES | Colt |
Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2360 mm |