1989 Chrysler ES vs. 1968 Toyota 1000
To start off, 1989 Chrysler ES is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota 1000 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1968 Toyota 1000. (46 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler ES weights approximately 405 kg more than 1968 Toyota 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Toyota 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Chrysler ES (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota 1000. (65 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1989 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler ES | 1968 Toyota 1000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | ES | 1000 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 46 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 65 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 61 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2170 mm |