1989 Chrysler ES vs. 1969 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1989 Chrysler ES is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Mustang (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 271 kg more than 1989 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Mustang (257 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler ES | 1969 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Mustang |
Year Released | 1989 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |