1989 Chrysler ES vs. 2002 Dodge M80
To start off, 2002 Dodge M80 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge M80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge M80 (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge M80 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler ES weights approximately 10 kg more than 2002 Dodge M80.
Because 2002 Dodge M80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Chrysler ES. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge M80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge M80 (319 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Dodge M80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler ES | 2002 Dodge M80 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | ES | M80 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2850 mm |
