1989 Chrysler ES vs. 2005 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2005 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 03-Sep (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 03-Sep weights approximately 440 kg more than 1989 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 03-Sep (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler ES | 2005 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Chrysler | Saab |
Model | ES | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 1989 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2675 mm |