1989 Chrysler ES vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler ES. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler ES | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | ES | Epica |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |