1989 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler ES | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1989 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 269 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2340 mm |