1989 Chrysler ES vs. 2012 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volkswagen Polo (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1989 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1989 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler ES weights approximately 57 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volkswagen Polo (175 Nm @ 1550 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler ES | 2012 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
Model | ES | Polo |
Year Released | 1989 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1088 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2470 mm |