1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1951 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Jaguar C-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Jaguar C-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1951 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Le Baron | C-Type |
Year Released | 1989 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2440 mm |