1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 470 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Chrysler | Talbot |
Model | Le Baron | Baby |
Year Released | 1989 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3130 mm |