1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1953 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 600 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1953 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1953 Hudson Hornet | |
| Make | Chrysler | Hudson |
| Model | Le Baron | Hornet |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2210 cc | 4810 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2990 mm |
