1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 2,210 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 560 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1963 NSU 1000 C | |
| Make | Chrysler | NSU |
| Model | Le Baron | 1000 C |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2210 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 39 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 44 L |
