1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1965 AC Cobra
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 190 kg more than 1965 AC Cobra.
Because 1965 AC Cobra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 AC Cobra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1965 AC Cobra | |
Make | Chrysler | AC |
Model | Le Baron | Cobra |
Year Released | 1989 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2210 cc | 4737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 267 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 68 L |