1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1972 Volvo 164
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Volvo 164 weights approximately 180 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1972 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1972 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Le Baron | 164 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2730 mm |