1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1976 Chrysler 1609
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1976 Chrysler 1609 | |
Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
Model | Le Baron | 1609 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1812 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2670 mm |