1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 90 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1980 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | Le Baron | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2530 mm |
