1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1991 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1991 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Mustang weights approximately 80 kg more than 1989 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1991 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1991 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Mustang |
Year Released | 1989 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2560 mm |