1989 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 80 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1989 Chrysler Le Baron | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 1989 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2615 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2350 mm |
